UFO Questions and Live Comments

UFO Ques­tions and Com­ments Page for inter­ac­tion dur­ing the live broadcast.

If you have ufo ques­tions or com­ments for our guest dur­ing the show you can post them here.  If you sub­scribe to the pod­cast and lis­ten after the show has aired please feel free to add your com­ments here as well.

Have you seen a UFO? Do you believe we are alone in this mas­sive uni­verse? How do we explain UFO sight­ings? Why doesn’t the media report sight­ings? What about the Gov­ern­ment? Is there a cover-up? Will the U.S. release files? Join The Kate Valen­tine UFO Show on its Jour­ney for Answers on the weekly radio pro­gram or sub­scribe to the pod­cast series that has been run­ning since Jan­u­ary 8th, 2010. The pod­cast is avail­able here on the web­site through email sub­scrip­tion or at the iTunes store, free of charge.


390 thoughts on “UFO Questions and Live Comments

  1. Pingback: Kate Valentine Final Show Friday November 23 2013 - UFO Kate Valentine UFO Show

  2. Have been lis­ten­ing for a cou­ple of years now. Very sad to hear that the show is end­ing. Best wishes from Birm­ing­ham England.

  3. Hav­ing the ETH as a pet the­ory means that I don’t par­tic­u­larly like the Trick­ster con­cept, but per­sonal biases aren’t (or shouldn’t be) a fac­tor in this field. How­ever, it’s an idea that leads to some addi­tional ques­tions and prob­lems:
    1. We’re still left with the ET ques­tion hang­ing in the air — Sci­ence tends towards an expec­ta­tion of find­ing other intel­li­gent life in our galaxy, given nat­ural processes and the age of the uni­verse. Any such life, or its tech­no­log­i­cal off­spring, should have found its way to Earth long ago. (The Fermi para­dox.)
    2. What are the lim­its, if any, to the Trickster’s abil­i­ties? Sci­en­tists dis­cov­ered, and con­tinue to dis­cover, nat­ural laws that tend to hold true from day to day. The Trickster’s antics seem to be restricted in space and time — maybe even lim­ited to mess­ing with the human race (and cows). Is human con­scious­ness respon­si­ble for the Trick­ster?
    3. Are ‘UFOs, the para­nor­mal and cat­tle muti­la­tion’ sub­sets of an umbrella Trick­ster phe­nom­e­non? Or are inde­pen­dent phe­nom­ena in play?

  4. Kate,

    As an admirer of your show, I am so sad that I won’t be able to hear your voice ( after next week) on Fri­days any more. Your show has been the sec­ond very good rea­son I have looked for­ward to Fri­days. I look for­ward to next week’s show and will send along my thoughts on the UAP phe­nom­e­non as a small con­tri­bu­tion to the show.

    The UAP sub­ject is crit­i­cally impor­tant and it needs to remain in the aware­ness of every per­son. Thank you, Kate, for stim­u­lat­ing all of us with your thoughts, your guests, and, above all, your graciousness.

  5. Hi Kate. Can you kindly ask Peter if he has ever found proof implanted of screen mem­o­ries to be falsely brought out dur­ing hynop­tic suggestion.

  6. Ger­ard ! Great to hear you right now on Kate’s great show ! I pro­duce a web series about UFOs called Mil­gram And The Fast­walk­ers (www.fastwalekrseries.com) “a noir soap opera about UFOs…” And we pro­duce it in the Bal­ti­more area, so your area of exper­tise in the Mid-Atlantic is fas­ci­nat­ing to us…I can con­firm that doing inter­views with wit­nesses and abductees is a fas­ci­nat­ing expe­ri­ence. I have inter­viewed a lot of them for our show…Can you tell us if you’ve got any tales about UFO sight­ings in the greater Bal­ti­more area, or on Maryland’s East­ern Shore ? And yes, I have met many abductees who really don’t like their expe­ri­ences, and who would choose the expe­ri­ence out of their life in a heart­beat. Great show, Kate, thanks ! :-)

      • Kate, I am SO glad you and Ger­ard are talk­ing about the psy­chol­ogy aspects of the Expe­ri­ence — and Gerard’s point of self-awareness — because the whole advance­ment of study­ing UFOs as a cred­i­ble area of inves­ti­ga­tion mov­ing for­ward will depend on frank dis­cus­sion, like the one you are hav­ing now with Ger­ard. Dis­cus­sion that takes into account the vary­ing lev­els of com­fort­a­bil­ity peo­ple have with the sub­ject itself. And Abductees like Ger­ard, who can talk about this with frank­ness, with an artic­u­la­tion about the details, really help to nor­mal­ize the topic in the public’s gen­eral view. On our show we try to show that for every per­son who looks at the topic, there is a dif­fer­ent psy­cho­log­i­cal reac­tion — and they run the gamut — from abject fear, to skep­ti­cism, to mak­ing fun of it as a defense mech­a­nism, and on and on…You are touch­ing on a VERY fas­ci­nat­ing sub­ject here… THANK you for it !

  7. Hey Free­man. I wish you the best on that great ini­tia­tive. Please keep us posted. I saw doc­u­ments show­ing that VandeHaur(sp) Bush was involved in govt UFO research as far back as the early 40’s. And then I read he was the founder of Raytheon Radar.
    Won­der how he got the lead­ing edge on early radar technology???

    • Thanks Neu­tron.
      There’s always a degree of pro­gres­sion involved in tech­nol­ogy. Most of the time we need to under­stand nature’s laws before engi­neers can build new gad­gets.
      I’ve won­dered about accounts of alien tech­nol­ogy and while I doubt such tech­nol­ogy would cre­ate a new branch of sci­ence, if it did exist, then I’m sure we’d assim­i­late any new knowl­edge that could be obtained.

  8. One of the good things about radar data is that most coun­tries tend to adopt sim­i­lar pro­to­cols for inves­ti­gat­ing air acci­dents, and stor­ing dig­i­tized radar data. As radar equip­ment tends to be off-the-shelf, data are recorded in stan­dard for­mats.
    While the sophis­ti­ca­tion of mod­ern radar tech­nol­ogy should not be under­stated, the sim­plest out­put avail­able hasn’t changed much since the Amer­i­can SAGE sys­tem laid the ground­work (i.e. sim­ple enough for ama­teurs to plot and analyse).

    The biggest prob­lem is pris­ing the data out of bureau­cratic hands. We are for­tu­nate that U.S. radar data fall within the scope of U.S. FoI leg­is­la­tion. I’m cur­rently appeal­ing a FOIA case in the UK to gain access to sim­i­lar data over here. Ear­lier this year I sent queries (in Eng­lish), to a num­ber of for­eign Air Nav­i­ga­tion Ser­vice Providers regard­ing access to radar data (includ­ing Turkey), but only a cou­ple replied (in the negative).

    I’m hop­ing that inter­na­tional co-operation between offi­cial UFO/UAP study groups will even­tu­ally lead to greater access to dif­fer­ent (ATC) radar data sources. It is also pos­si­ble that coun­tries adopt­ing FOI leg­is­la­tion may auto­mat­i­cally pro­vide access to radar data, as the U.S. does, but the sit­u­a­tion can become com­pli­cated depend­ing on whether air traf­fic con­trol is state run or not.
    (There can also be points relat­ing to secu­rity that have to be addressed).

    If any­one learns or knows of another coun­try that pro­vides pub­lic access to radar data I would very much like to know.

  9. HI Kate! Have been lis­ten­ing to your pod cast for a few months now and love it! I’m from Cam­bridgeshire in the UK and have been intrigued buy your Spray­ing episode and Darcey.. Love it!! Please say hello, I drive around lis­ten­ing to your down­load and have found myself singing your theme tune while dri­ving around Lon­don!! Thanks, Gavin Miller

Insert two cents here.